|
Within a Headless CMS it is difficult to determine how the contents will be viewed by users. On the other hand, the backend only content management system makes them accessible to external clients for viewing via API. This means that any content can be stored and distributed with absolute ease on any platform website, app for mobile devices, Virtual Reality and much more. WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND HEADLESS CMS? To clarify, we compare two Content Management Systems, traditional and headless, that we at Bulldog have used for our main customers. WordPress is among the best known traditional CMS ever. A software which, once installed on a server, allows you to create a website and modify the contents via a control panel without necessarily having to work on the code, be an expert developer or have to work on the database.
The big limitation of WordPress, but the same applies to other popular CMS such as Joomla photo editing servies or Drupal, is that being a closed system it does not allow total control over graphic customizations and functionality. The user can install Plugins and Themes from the official Directory to enrich the site consistently with their needs, but is forced to choose from a set of predefined options. Furthermore, if they need assistance they have to turn to developers who work on the CMS, wasting time, resources and budget for the maintenance and interventions required. CMS traditional jpg The approach of a Headless CMS like Evelin is different , as it allows you to simplify the entire content management process , freely carry out customizations on texts, touchpoints, related contents, but also offer important features such as.
CRM integration and management of posts, Pulse articles, stories to be delivered within specific social pages. This allows you to obtain the best result from a User Experience perspective, a notable saving in terms of costs and great freedom for the editor/client working on the CMS. headless cms .jpg WHAT ARE THE HEADLESS CMSS TO KNOW? In summary, the traditional CMS is still a good choice for small websites, where it is not necessary to share content with multiple devices or digital platforms. Otherwise, the headless CMS is confirmed as the best choice. Here are the best on the digital market Sanity.io It is among the leaders in the headless.
|
|